Updated Reviewed quarterly
KGH vs FNZ: One Fund or Two?
KGH · Kernel
TER 0.25% · Yield 2.1% · multi-asset global
FNZ · Smartshares
TER 0.52% · Yield 3.8% · NZ equity only
A different comparison: KGH is a one-stop globally-diversified growth fund. FNZ is a building block — pure NZ equity. They solve different problems.
In 30 seconds: KGH is a multi-asset growth fund holding NZ equity, global equity, and a small defensive sleeve at 0.25% TER — designed for investors who want a single globally-diversified holding. FNZ is a pure NZ Top 50 equity ETF at 0.52% TER — designed as a building block within a larger portfolio. Both are NZ-PIE, both NZX-listed. If you're choosing one fund and walking away, KGH gives more diversification. If you're building a portfolio piece-by-piece, FNZ is the NZ-equity slice.
- KGH: Kernel High Growth — multi-asset, globally diversified, 0.25% TER
- FNZ: Smartshares NZ Top 50 — single-country NZ equity, 0.52% TER
- Both PIE-taxed at max 28% PIR
- KGH is a one-fund solution; FNZ is a portfolio building block
- Where to buy: Kernel direct (KGH zero-fee), InvestNow (FNZ zero-fee), Sharesies
Head-to-head comparison
| Feature | KGH | FNZ |
|---|---|---|
| Fund | Kernel High Growth Fund | Smartshares NZ Top 50 ETF |
| Issuer | Kernel | Smartshares |
| Structure | Multi-asset (fund-of-funds) | Single-asset index ETF |
| Geographic exposure | Global (incl. NZ) | NZ only |
| Asset mix | ~95% equities, small bond/cash sleeve | 100% NZ equities |
| Total expense ratio | 0.25% | 0.52% |
| Dividend yield (TTM) | 2.1% | 3.8% |
| Tax wrapper | PIE | PIE |
| Rebalancing | Automatic (inside the fund) | You rebalance (if held alongside global) |
These funds solve different problems
KGH is a complete-portfolio solution. Inside KGH you already get NZ equity, global equity, and a defensive sleeve — Kernel rebalances the allocation for you. If you hold KGH, you don't need to layer FNZ on top unless you specifically want to over-weight NZ.
FNZ is a building block. Most NZ investors who hold FNZ pair it with a global fund like KGM or USF. A common NZ portfolio shape is a minority weighting to FNZ (NZ-only) paired with a majority weighting to a global fund — you control the geographic split yourself rather than delegating to a multi-asset wrapper.
The fee comparison is interesting: KGH gives global diversification + multi-asset rebalancing at a lower TER than FNZ's single-country exposure. That's because KGH uses lower-cost underlying funds and benefits from Kernel's scale.
These are characteristics of each fund, not investment recommendations. Consult a licensed financial adviser about your specific circumstances.