Skip to main content

Updated Reviewed quarterly

KGH vs FNZ: One Fund or Two?

KGH · Kernel

TER 0.25% · Yield 2.1% · multi-asset global

FNZ · Smartshares

TER 0.52% · Yield 3.8% · NZ equity only

A different comparison: KGH is a one-stop globally-diversified growth fund. FNZ is a building block — pure NZ equity. They solve different problems.

In 30 seconds: KGH is a multi-asset growth fund holding NZ equity, global equity, and a small defensive sleeve at 0.25% TER — designed for investors who want a single globally-diversified holding. FNZ is a pure NZ Top 50 equity ETF at 0.52% TER — designed as a building block within a larger portfolio. Both are NZ-PIE, both NZX-listed. If you're choosing one fund and walking away, KGH gives more diversification. If you're building a portfolio piece-by-piece, FNZ is the NZ-equity slice.

  • KGH: Kernel High Growth — multi-asset, globally diversified, 0.25% TER
  • FNZ: Smartshares NZ Top 50 — single-country NZ equity, 0.52% TER
  • Both PIE-taxed at max 28% PIR
  • KGH is a one-fund solution; FNZ is a portfolio building block
  • Where to buy: Kernel direct (KGH zero-fee), InvestNow (FNZ zero-fee), Sharesies

Head-to-head comparison

FeatureKGHFNZ
FundKernel High Growth FundSmartshares NZ Top 50 ETF
IssuerKernelSmartshares
StructureMulti-asset (fund-of-funds)Single-asset index ETF
Geographic exposureGlobal (incl. NZ)NZ only
Asset mix~95% equities, small bond/cash sleeve100% NZ equities
Total expense ratio0.25%0.52%
Dividend yield (TTM)2.1%3.8%
Tax wrapperPIEPIE
RebalancingAutomatic (inside the fund)You rebalance (if held alongside global)

These funds solve different problems

KGH is a complete-portfolio solution. Inside KGH you already get NZ equity, global equity, and a defensive sleeve — Kernel rebalances the allocation for you. If you hold KGH, you don't need to layer FNZ on top unless you specifically want to over-weight NZ.

FNZ is a building block. Most NZ investors who hold FNZ pair it with a global fund like KGM or USF. A common NZ portfolio shape is a minority weighting to FNZ (NZ-only) paired with a majority weighting to a global fund — you control the geographic split yourself rather than delegating to a multi-asset wrapper.

The fee comparison is interesting: KGH gives global diversification + multi-asset rebalancing at a lower TER than FNZ's single-country exposure. That's because KGH uses lower-cost underlying funds and benefits from Kernel's scale.

These are characteristics of each fund, not investment recommendations. Consult a licensed financial adviser about your specific circumstances.

Next steps