Updated Reviewed quarterly
JEPI vs JEPQ: S&P vs Nasdaq Income
JEPI
TER 0.35% · Yield 7.5% · Monthly
JEPQ
TER 0.35% · Yield 9.0% · Monthly
Same JPMorgan covered-call income strategy, two different equity baskets. Which one fits your portfolio?
Key difference
Same strategy, different equity baskets. JEPI is built on S&P 500 stocks (sector-diversified — financials, healthcare, industrials, tech). JEPQ is built on Nasdaq-100 stocks (concentrated in tech: Apple, Microsoft, Nvidia, Amazon, Meta). Higher implied volatility on Nasdaq-100 names lets JEPQ generate richer option premium and a higher distribution yield, at the cost of higher concentration risk.
Two equity baskets, same overlay
JEPI — S&P 500 + covered call
Broader US large-cap exposure with sector diversity:
- ✓ ~7.5% yield, monthly distributions
- ✓ Spread across ~11 GICS sectors (financials ~17%, healthcare ~14%, industrials ~9%, tech ~28%)
- ✓ Lower equity-volatility profile than JEPQ
- ✗ Lower yield because lower underlying volatility = lower option premiums
JEPQ — Nasdaq-100 + covered call
Tech-tilted exposure with higher implied volatility:
- ✓ ~9.0% yield, monthly distributions
- ✓ Concentrated in tech mega-caps (top 10 = ~50% of portfolio)
- ✓ Richer option premiums from higher implied volatility
- ✗ Higher concentration risk; underperforms more in tech-led rallies
Head-to-head comparison
| Feature | JEPI | JEPQ |
|---|---|---|
| Equity basket | S&P 500 (sector-diversified) | Nasdaq-100 (tech-tilted) |
| TTM Yield | 7.5% | 9.0% |
| Distribution frequency | Monthly | Monthly |
| Expense ratio | 0.35% | 0.35% |
| Strategy | Equity + covered calls | Equity + covered calls |
| Concentration | ~500 holdings | ~100 holdings (tech-heavy) |
| Suited to | Diversified income seekers | Tech-tilted income seekers |
For New Zealand investors
Both fall under FIF
Both are US-domiciled ETFs. Above NZ$50,000 cost basis, FIF rules apply — most NZ investors use the FDR method (5% × opening market value × marginal rate). FDR vs CV method →
US withholding on distributions
Both apply 15% US withholding tax under the NZ–US tax treaty (with a W-8BEN). Note that JEPQ's higher yield means more dollar-tax withheld — on NZ$100,000, ~NZ$1,350/yr withheld vs ~NZ$1,125 on JEPI. Both are claimable as foreign tax credits on your IR3.
Covered-call income tax classification
Premium income from covered calls may not qualify for the reduced US treaty withholding rate the same way ordinary dividends do. Your broker's annual tax statement should split the distribution between qualified dividends, ordinary income, and return of capital — work with a NZ tax adviser if your portfolio is sizeable.
Which one suits which investor
Suited to JEPI
- Income seekers wanting sector-diversified US large-cap exposure
- Investors with existing tech-heavy holdings elsewhere (avoid double-up)
- Portfolios prioritising lower equity-volatility profile
Suited to JEPQ
- Income seekers comfortable with concentrated tech exposure
- Higher current-yield priority (~1.5% pickup over JEPI)
- Investors expecting flat or modest tech returns (covered-call premium = upside)
These are general product characteristics, not recommendations. Consult a licensed financial adviser to assess suitability for your circumstances.
Learn more about these ETFs
Both available on NZ investment platforms
Related to JEPI vs JEPQ
JEPI ETF detail
Full JEPI guide for NZ investors.
JEPQ ETF detail
Full JEPQ guide for NZ investors.
JEPI vs SCHD
Income-now vs growing-income comparison.
QQQ — Nasdaq-100 (no overlay)
Pure Nasdaq-100 equity exposure without covered calls.
Best dividend ETFs for NZ
Curated dividend-income picks.
How to buy US ETFs from NZ
Platforms supporting JEPI + JEPQ.